The Battle of the Birds
(Scotland, Gaelic)
There was once a time when every creature and bird was gathering to battle. The son of the king of Tethertown said that he would go to see the battle and that he would bring sure word home to his father the king, who would be king of the creatures this year. The battle was over before he arrived all but one fight, a great black raven and a snake, and it seemed as if the snake would get the victory over the raven. When the king’s son saw this, he helped the raven and with one blow takes the head off the snake.
"Every creature and bird was gathering to battle." Animals suggest archetypal principles because they embody many different forms with different qualities and are ancient and vigorous and true to themselves. What can it mean that all the creatures are battling? Fundamental oppositions are being worked out, that is, we are going to see what are some of the fundamental opposites, how they conflict, and what may emerge from this conflict.
In particular the snake and the raven battle. Both are phallic, one like the body phallus, the other like the head phallus - a bird is like an idea that flies far and swiftly and can go wherever it wants, without earthly limitations, as though unattached to the body.
There is a parallel in the Polynesian story of Hina and the eel: Hina had to cut off the head of her eel-lover: she buried the head and from it grew all the technology of her island culture. She sacrificed her bodily pleasure in order to transform her experience of the animus - the masculine principle - into spiritual knowledge.
Since this Scottish story begins with the killing of the snake, its main theme may be the evolution of the experience of the animus. If so, then that interpretation will be confirmed by succeeding images which repeat and elaborate that theme.
Since the animus is an archetype it does not evolve, as species evolve, or as personalities evolve. An archetype is a constant principle which cannot transform. What transforms is our relationship to the archetype, our way of making its qualities manifest. We can manifest the animus as as muscle man, or a lover, or a wise man, or a spiritual guide.
The prince's father will be "king of the creatures this year". So he is a year king (sacrificed annually) who is responsible for all the archetypes. Who will be king of the creatures next year? Symbolically it is implied that the prince will succeed his father. Already we have a repetition, another image suggesting the transformation of the experience of the animus.
In medieval europe the king was understood to rule by dispensation from God. The king is a representative of an overarching principle, like a sky god, Zeus or Odin or Jahweh, which integrates all other archetypes. Jung called this principle the Self. The king is a human manifestation which needs every year to be renewed while the Self per se is timeless. The underlying organizational principles are eternal and omnipresent, while the cultural manifestation of those principles must always be refreshed.
When the raven had taken breath, and saw that the snake was dead, he said, ‘For thy kindness to me this day, I will give thee a sight. Come up now on the root of my two wings.’ The king’s son mounted upon the raven, and, before he stopped, he took him over seven Bens, and seven Glens, and seven Mountain Moors.
The raven elevates the prince and shows him the breadth of the kingdom. This emphasizes the far-sighted, spiritual aspect of the animus.